BUKAA Logo BAJOPMAS

Paper View

Paper Information

PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL (MPC) AND NONLINEAR PID (NPID) FOR BLDC MOTOR SPEED CONTROL
2025 Volume 16
Ladan, A. S,muhammadalhajilawan0416@gmail.com,Department of Science Laboratory Technology, School of Science and Technology, Federal Polytechnic Daura, Katsina State, Nigeria.
Ado, M.,,Department of Physics, Faculty of Physical Science Bayero University Kano, Kano State, Nigeria.
Faruq, M. I,,Department of physics, Faculty of science, Sa’adu Zungur University, Gadau, Bauchi state, Nigeria.
Gaya, M.S,,Department of Electrical Engineering, Kano University of Science & Technology, Wudil, Nigeria.
Bello, M. I.,,Department of physics, Faculty of science, Modibbo Adama University Yola Nigeria.

Abstract:
The utilization of Brushless Direct Current (BLDC) motor in real world is undoubtedly growing because of their high efficiency, low maintenance requirements, minimal noise level, and reliability. Nevertheless, nonlinearities and parameter uncertainties make the system control a bit harder. Similarly, a study comparing the effectiveness of the two promising controllers is limited. Model Predictive Control (MPC) which have been known due to their ability in predicting the future behavior of a system (motor) and accommodating of constraints Also, Nonlinear PID (NPID) which was an upgraded version of conventional PID so as to handles the system nonlinearities and uncertainties. This study presents a comparative evaluation of Model Predictive Control (MPC) and Nonlinear PID (NPID) for regulating the speed of a BLDC motor. A comprehensive transfer function which captures both electrical and mechanical dynamics of the system was formulated from the mathematical model and the controllers were both developed and analyzed in MATLAB/Simulink. The performance metrics which includes rise time, settling time, and overshoot percentage are measured. The simulation outcomes highlights that the NPID demonstrates a quicker response, while the MPC reduces overshoot and a smoother transient performance. Additional input signals, such as sine waveform, square waveform, and ramp were applied to evaluate the tracking capability, revealing that NPID possess a slightly better tracking ability under all the conditions. This finding reveals the ability of both advanced control algorithms in addressing the nonlinearities and parameter uncertainties of the motor.

Keyward(s): Brushless DC motor (BLDC), Model Predictive Control (MPC), MATLAB/Simulink, Nonlinear PID (NPID), Speed Regulation.

Download